The current dreadful shooting in Las Vegas has actually touched off a variety of short articles and propositions by travel authors on the relationship of hotel security procedures to acts of terrorism.
For instance: Should the luggage of hotel visitors go through the very same electronic examination as the very same bags go through at airports? Should guard get in a hotel space whose front door has shown a “do not interrupt” indication for more than a little number of hours? Should all hotel spaces– like those at Mandalay Bay Resort and Gambling Establishment, where the Vegas shooter devoted his criminal offense– go through regular examination? Should the function of hotel security be raised from its present low significance? Should hotel housekeeping personnel be trained to discover security threats?
Would any of these procedures have hindered the actions of Stephen Paddock, the criminal of America’s biggest mass shooting? Could a comparable shooting have happened in any of the numerous other gambling establishment resorts on the Las Vegas Strip? Could a prospective shooter with a golf bag usage that familiar sporting device to hide numerous rifles or other attack weapons?
Should hotels, dining halls, and other locations of mass event now embrace extreme security procedures to avoid a reoccurrence of the Las Vegas disaster? Should the travel market develop a better relationship with regional police?
The very best treatment of these concerns that I have actually discovered is a rather prolonged short article by Dr. Peter Tarlow, a specialist in tourist security who has actually composed thoroughly on the topic. Dr. Tarlow’s latest post on the topic can be discovered at the popular travel site Tripatini.
